NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court will pronounce its verdict on Monday on a batch of petitions seeking quashing of Gujarat government’s decision to remit the sentences of 11 convicts who had gang-raped Bilkis Bano and killed 14 members of her family during the 2002 communal riots. The petitions include one filed by Bilkis herself.
A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan had wrapped up proceedings in October and reserved its verdict after hearing all the parties, including the convicts.
During the hearing, the Centre and the Gujarat government had justified the decision to allow their premature release, saying they did not commit a “rarest-of-rare crime” and they should be given a chance to reform and reintegrate in society. However, the bench had asked why the remission policy was being implemented selectively and many other prisoners, who fulfilled the criteria of remission, continued to languish in jail. The court had also noted that the convicts were allowed to come out on parole multiple times and observed that some prisoners were more privileged than others.
Bilkis, in her submission, had told the bench that the state granted them remission without considering the nature of the offence and they did not deserve any leniency as they were not at all remorseful.
Bilkis was 21 years old and five months pregnant when she was gang-raped and her three-year-old daughter was among the 14 family members who were killed.
A batch of petitions was filed in the apex court by social activists and politicians soon after all 11 convicts were granted remission and released on August 15 last year. Bilkis moved the apex court in November.
CPM leader Subhashini Ali, independent journalist Revati Lau, former vice-chancellor of Lucknow University Roop Rekha Verma and TMC MP Mahua Moitra are some of the petitioners who moved the SC against the remission.
The convicts had submitted that they already suffered a lot and spent more than 14 years in jail and should be allowed to re-unite with their family members. Pleading that their freedom should not be “snatched”, they had said the court should take a reformative approach and they be given a chance to reform themselves.
A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan had wrapped up proceedings in October and reserved its verdict after hearing all the parties, including the convicts.
During the hearing, the Centre and the Gujarat government had justified the decision to allow their premature release, saying they did not commit a “rarest-of-rare crime” and they should be given a chance to reform and reintegrate in society. However, the bench had asked why the remission policy was being implemented selectively and many other prisoners, who fulfilled the criteria of remission, continued to languish in jail. The court had also noted that the convicts were allowed to come out on parole multiple times and observed that some prisoners were more privileged than others.
Bilkis, in her submission, had told the bench that the state granted them remission without considering the nature of the offence and they did not deserve any leniency as they were not at all remorseful.
Bilkis was 21 years old and five months pregnant when she was gang-raped and her three-year-old daughter was among the 14 family members who were killed.
A batch of petitions was filed in the apex court by social activists and politicians soon after all 11 convicts were granted remission and released on August 15 last year. Bilkis moved the apex court in November.
CPM leader Subhashini Ali, independent journalist Revati Lau, former vice-chancellor of Lucknow University Roop Rekha Verma and TMC MP Mahua Moitra are some of the petitioners who moved the SC against the remission.
The convicts had submitted that they already suffered a lot and spent more than 14 years in jail and should be allowed to re-unite with their family members. Pleading that their freedom should not be “snatched”, they had said the court should take a reformative approach and they be given a chance to reform themselves.
